Skip to content
Post-award reporting copilot for small nonprofits

Walk into every grant report with the evidence already gathered.

Tracekeel assembles the context a report needs — obligations, deadlines, outcome metrics, and finances — and turns it into a funder-ready draft you review and submit.

Grounded in your data. Not an AI essay writer — you stay in control.

Built for foundation & state grants·Human-in-the-loop, always·Every number traceable to your data·Now piloting with small nonprofits

For a one-person grants shop, every report is a fire drill.

Reporting falls on one overstretched program manager. The deadlines hide in PDF legalese, and the evidence is scattered everywhere.

Deadlines sneak up

Each agreement buries due dates in legalese. People find out a report is due when the funder emails.

The work is assembly

Hours reconstructing what you promised, what you did, and how it compares — before a sentence is written.

Every funder differs

The same facts get re-keyed into each funder's template, questions, and tables.

Mistakes are costly

A missed deadline or an unsupported number strains the funder relationship the org depends on.

The insight

The writing is the easy 20%. Assembling grounded context is the painful 80%.

So Tracekeel automates the 80% — pulling together what you promised, what you did, and how the numbers compare — and keeps a human firmly in control of the 20%.

Assembling context80%

Obligations · deadlines · metrics · finances — now automated.

Writing the report20%

A grounded draft you review, edit, and submit. You stay accountable.

How it works

Four layers that feed each other.

Each layer builds the spine of context the next one needs — from a PDF agreement all the way to a funder-ready draft.

1Ingest the obligation

Upload a grant agreement. Tracekeel extracts what you promised.

Claude reads the PDF and pulls out reporting obligations, due dates, narrative questions, budget figures, and metric targets — then asks you to confirm.

Every item shows its confidence and source page
You verify before anything is trusted
Structured obligations feed all three layers below
Screen · Agreements
Hartwell_Agreement.pdf · review
Quarterly narrative + financialHigh
Source · p. 4Confirm
Youth enrolled · target 120High
Source · p. 5Confirm
Average attendance · target 80%Medium
Source · p. 5Confirm

The whole chain collapses if the data spine goes stale.

So we engineered the spine for near-effortless upkeep. Keeping it fresh is the one habit the product makes easy — and it's designed around exactly that.

One-step recurring CSV
Drop your latest export; columns auto-map and you confirm.
Idempotent re-import
Replace-by-key means re-uploads never duplicate.
Visible staleness
Current vs. stale badges on every metric.
Nudges before it bites
Dashboard + email surface stale data feeding an imminent report.
Data spine · Outcome metrics
Youth enrolledCurrent
112 / 120
Mentor matchesStale · 12d
54 / 60
Avg. attendanceCurrent
76 / 80%
WorkshopsCurrent
18 / 24

Assemble, check, draft, export — then you submit.

When a report comes due, Tracekeel maps your spine into the funder's fields and does the careful work no one has time for.

STEP 1
Assemble
Pull the relevant spine data into the funder's fields.
STEP 2
Compute variance
Actual vs. target and actual vs. budget, automatically.
STEP 3
Flag gaps
Missing or stale data surfaced before submission.
STEP 4
Draft
A grounded narrative in the funder's format. You edit.
STEP 5
Export & submit
.docx or PDF, then mark submitted. You submit.
Tracekeel never auto-submits. It gets you to a finished, reviewed draft — the human stays accountable to the funder.

Reporting goes from dreaded fire drill to calm review-and-submit.

Before Tracekeel
With Tracekeel
Deadlines discovered by surprise
A live calendar + 30/14/3-day reminders + digest emails
Hours hunting for what we promised and did
Obligations, metrics, and finances already assembled
Variance computed by hand in a spreadsheet
Variance vs. target and budget computed automatically
“Did we forget a number?” found at submission
Missing data flagged up front
Re-keying facts into each funder's template
A funder-formatted draft in minutes
Reporting as a dreaded fire drill
Reporting as a calm review-and-submit

Deliberate boundaries, in service of funder trust.

Not an AI-writer-first product

Every number is grounded in data you supplied. Tracekeel assembles and drafts — it doesn't invent.

You submit — no auto-submission

Tracekeel gets you to a reviewed draft. The human stays accountable.

Foundation + state grants only

No federal reporting or 2 CFR 200 in scope — a different compliance beast.

CSV is the on-ramp

No Salesforce, QuickBooks, or Blackbaud hookups yet — recurring CSV is the simple way in.

Minimal, calm UI

Built for an overstretched non-technical user, not a power analyst.

A self-contained, working POC.

PDF upload + AI extraction + human confirm/review
Reporting calendar with derived statuses
Subscribable ICS feed (30/14/3-day alarms)
Daily reminder emails + per-user opt-out
Outcome metrics: progress-to-target + freshness
Per-grant budget-vs-actual financials
Recurring CSV import + manual CRUD
Variance + missing-data flags + grounded draft
Export to .docx and PDF
Mark-submitted / reopen workflow
Home dashboard: KPIs + triage feed
Secure multi-tenant, row-level isolation

Out of scope for v1

Federal reporting / 2 CFR 200
Auto-submission to funder portals
CRM / accounting integrations
Multi-user roles & teams
Impact / board dashboards

Under the hood

A modern serverless stack with Claude doing the reading and drafting — a cheaper model for extraction, a stronger one for variance reasoning and narrative. Multi-tenant with row-level isolation, one organization per user.

Who it's for · the pilot

For small nonprofits juggling a handful of foundation and state grants.

If reporting lives in spreadsheets and falls on one or two non-technical staff, Tracekeel was built for you. We're onboarding our first pilot nonprofits now.

No spam. We'll only email you about Tracekeel access.